Overview
The chair features a distinctive five-petal 'lotus' or 'flower' silhouette hand-woven from thick natural fibers (likely water hyacinth or seagrass) over a metal frame, set on a minimalist black iron tripod base.
Identification
Photo reference
1 uploaded photo
Overview
The chair features a distinctive five-petal 'lotus' or 'flower' silhouette hand-woven from thick natural fibers (likely water hyacinth or seagrass) over a metal frame, set on a minimalist black iron tripod base.
Story
This style of woven 'lotus' or 'petal' chair emerged in the mid-20th century, blending tropical natural fiber craftsmanship with the minimalist iron frames of the Atomic Age. Without a maker's mark or label, it is currently attributed as an unbranded mid-century or 1970s bohemian accent piece. The market for vintage bohemian and woven natural fiber furniture remains steady, driven by interior design trends favoring organic textures and mid-century silhouettes.
Maker / Origin
Unattributed
Condition & Value
Based on the visible photo, the woven natural fibers appear generally intact with a consistent color, and the iron base shows standard vintage wear. However, a full assessment is pending photos of the back, underside, and seat to confirm there are no unravelling fibers, structural breaks, or missing weaves.
Full Research
Sold comps, value drivers, and venue guidance pulled from recent auction results.
The market for vintage bohemian and woven natural fiber furniture remains steady, driven by interior design trends favoring organic textures and mid-century silhouettes. Unbranded or generic imported pieces typically trade locally or on peer-to-peer platforms at modest price points due to shipping constraints. However, documented designer pieces from the same era command significant premiums at specialized modern design auctions.
▲ Distinctive mid-century 'lotus' or 'petal' silhouette appeals strongly to current organic modern design trends.
▲ Natural woven fiber (water hyacinth or seagrass) appears visually intact in the primary viewing angle.
▲ Minimalist iron base provides a desirable material contrast typical of 1950s-1970s design.
▼ Unverified maker — lack of a label or stamp restricts the piece to unbranded secondary market pricing.
▼ Unverified structural integrity — hidden unravelling or breaks in the weave on the back or underside would significantly depress value.
▼ Ambiguous base structure — visual discrepancies regarding the number of legs require confirmation to ensure stability.
Best Venue
List on a broad secondary marketplace like Chairish or eBay with local pickup options, as shipping costs for unbranded furniture often deter buyers. Prior to listing, thoroughly inspect the underside for any maker's marks or import tags that could elevate the attribution.
Upside Potential
If a maker's mark or label is discovered on the underside attributing the chair to a recognized designer (such as Miller Fong), the value shifts dramatically into the $1,500-$2,500+ collector tier.
Also found — market-range context
Surfaced during research but not used to anchor the valuation — wrong form, species, era, or no published price. Shown so the market range around this item is visible.