Overview
The document features a clear title page with the author's name (David Kaufman) and an explicit date (August 1974), serving as a verifiable mark that allows for high confidence in the era and maker.
Identification
Photo reference
5 uploaded photos
Overview
The document features a clear title page with the author's name (David Kaufman) and an explicit date (August 1974), serving as a verifiable mark that allows for high confidence in the era and maker.
Story
David Kaufman was associated with the early personal computing movement in Menlo Park, California, a geographic epicenter of the tech revolution. The 1974 date places this document precisely during the era of the People's Computer Company (PCC) and the Homebrew Computer Club's formation, making it a primary source of early hacker and gaming culture. The market for early Silicon Valley and personal computing ephemera is highly robust, driven by tech founders, institutional archives, and specialized collectors.
Maker / Origin
David Kaufman
Condition & Value
Based on the provided information, the primary condition variable affecting value is the physical state of the document, specifically whether it is an original typewriter impression or a contemporary duplicate.
Full Research
Sold comps, value drivers, and venue guidance pulled from recent auction results.
The market for early Silicon Valley and personal computing ephemera is highly robust, driven by tech founders, institutional archives, and specialized collectors. While marquee names command five-figure sums, early primary source documents detailing the culture and hardware of the 1970s computing revolution have a strong and growing secondary market. Buyers actively seek original typescripts, schematics, and memos from the critical 1970-1976 window.
▲ 1974 date places the document at the dawn of the personal computing and video game revolution.
▲ Specific mentions of early hardware (PDP-8) and software (Pong, Space War) strongly appeal to tech historians.
▲ Menlo Park origin ties the manuscript directly to the geographic epicenter of early Silicon Valley.
▼ Unverified reproduction method — if confirmed as a standard photocopy rather than an original typescript, value drops to the low end of the range.
▼ Unknown completeness — missing pages would severely impact historical utility and collector value.
▼ Author recognition — Kaufman lacks the marquee name recognition of peers like Engelbart or Alcorn, capping the absolute ceiling.
Best Venue
List with a specialized auction house focusing on science and technology history (e. g., RR Auction, Bonhams, or Sotheby's History of Science sales). Prior to listing, verify the total page count and examine the text under magnification to confirm if it is an original typescript, as this distinction is essential for maximizing the estimate.
Authenticity Risk
mediumEarly computing ephemera from the 1970s is increasingly targeted by forgers due to rising values. While the content appears highly specific and period-accurate, a physical inspection of the paper stock, typewriter ribbon impressions, and aging characteristics (like staple rust or natural toning) is recommended to rule out a modern reproduction before a high-value sale.
Also found — market-range context
Surfaced during research but not used to anchor the valuation — wrong form, species, era, or no published price. Shown so the market range around this item is visible.